As a pro-life director, I was disappointed by last night's VP debate. I was hopeful that we might have a candidate who is truly pro-life, but I was sadly disappointed.

The moderator saved the issue until the end, and then opened the topic of abortion by making it a Catholic issue. While Ryan did say that his faith was only a part of the reason he is pro-life, he did not challenge the tactic, used by the pro-abortion camp, to label the abortion holocaust as a religious issue. Of course, Biden is well-entrenched in that camp and basically said he accepts the church's teaching but does not want to "force it on others like they [Ryan and Romney] do."

Of course, he will "force" such moral imperatives as forbidding stealing upon others, but forbidding the murder of the innocent life in the womb is just too much of an imposition of his own personal beliefs [Gak! Biden, you desiccated puppet of Satan]. I expected such foolishness out of Biden, marionette of Beelzebub that he is, but I was disappointed with Ryan.

Ryan clearly has a few IQ points on Biden, but how could he miss the opportunity to speak the truth? How can any pro-lifer who understands and accepts the basic moral principle that it is wrong to kill innocent life at any stage of development grant exceptions for rape and incest? It is confounding to me. The whole argument for life falls apart as soon as you make such exceptions. Either the life in question is innocent and worthy of life because of the fact of its existence, or it isn't. There is no moral dilemma presented by the circumstances of these so-called exceptions, only a greater temptation to murder. And, yes, we have to deal with the reality of that temptation and the injustice of the acts that bring it about, but we do not deal with it by validating it. [Gak! Ryan, you spineless lukewarm bile chunk.]

Ryan allowed this nonsense, that it is "a Catholic issue," to go unchallenged. Shame on him. He only whispered the fact that it is a human race issue that goes beyond personal feelings and convictions. He should have emphasized that it is like the law of gravitation or any other natural law to which we are obliged to submit. It is wrong to kill innocent people at any stage of development, period. He mealy-mouthed the universality of it, and then went on to act like a pro-choicer by placing some people in the category of those unworthy to live. God help Ryan get his act together. I was disheartened and nauseated by his lack of a spine.

Pray, men. Pray.